The day is glorious - postcard blue skies and blinding sun shimmering off the fjord in the distance. I had my door open, to let in a breeze. Then I heard a deafening racket outside - a low rumble that grew to a roar. It's always so placid here, I was startled then I remembered - there is an airshow in Oslo today. They are celebrating 100 years of the Norwegian Air Force. Norwegian and French planes will be conducting aerial maneuvers today and tomorrow over the fjord, which I can see from my window. Mystery sound solved. But I started thinking....why French? Why not British? Or American?
Of course, proximity - France is relatively close to Norway. Although, no closer than Britain really, and we have major air stations in Germany. I'm not sure if Norway buys its fighters from France, but that's always possible. But maybe it's more than convenience and business deals.
Norway and France had similar experiences in World War II - capitulation of a civilian government which did not reflect the desires of the population, followed by occupation. Both had fierce resistance movements, and martyrs, which undeniably aided the Allied cause. The exploits of Norwegian resistance fighters, skiing long distances in harsh conditions against hopeless odds has been the topic of more than one History Day project. We Americans never denigrate the actions of Norway when faced with the juggernaut of the Nazi war machine. We never mock their occupation; never doubt their courage, We certainly never call Norwegians"cheese eating surrender monkeys" as some do the French.
Which led me another deep thought - dangerous, I know. Why do Americans consider the Norwegians courageous, and the French cowards in the context of WWII? The actions of the their governments and civilians were remarkably similar. Why the disconnect in perception in the American popular mind? If anything, the French suffered more; so many battles were fought over the same ground which had been soaked in blood only a generation before. Norway saw no major battles, no wholesale bombing, no invading horde, not like France. And from the Norwegians I have talked to, they do not consider the French cowards, They save that distinction for the Swedes.
Thoughts?
Of course, proximity - France is relatively close to Norway. Although, no closer than Britain really, and we have major air stations in Germany. I'm not sure if Norway buys its fighters from France, but that's always possible. But maybe it's more than convenience and business deals.
Norway and France had similar experiences in World War II - capitulation of a civilian government which did not reflect the desires of the population, followed by occupation. Both had fierce resistance movements, and martyrs, which undeniably aided the Allied cause. The exploits of Norwegian resistance fighters, skiing long distances in harsh conditions against hopeless odds has been the topic of more than one History Day project. We Americans never denigrate the actions of Norway when faced with the juggernaut of the Nazi war machine. We never mock their occupation; never doubt their courage, We certainly never call Norwegians"cheese eating surrender monkeys" as some do the French.
Which led me another deep thought - dangerous, I know. Why do Americans consider the Norwegians courageous, and the French cowards in the context of WWII? The actions of the their governments and civilians were remarkably similar. Why the disconnect in perception in the American popular mind? If anything, the French suffered more; so many battles were fought over the same ground which had been soaked in blood only a generation before. Norway saw no major battles, no wholesale bombing, no invading horde, not like France. And from the Norwegians I have talked to, they do not consider the French cowards, They save that distinction for the Swedes.
Thoughts?